Ended
Full stats

0 Comments

MIBR Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

15

7

+7

103

3:3

7

1

7.5

+19%

19

10

4

+9

83

2:3

4

2

7.3

+21%

18

19

5

-1

76

5:2

4

0

6.5

+18%

17

14

1

+3

66

2:2

4

0

6.1

-6%

10

14

6

-4

63

1:1

2

1

5.7

-12%

Total

86

72

23

+14

392

13:11

21

4

6.6

+8%

Entropiq Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

16

2

+4

82

0:1

5

0

6.4

+7%

18

19

2

-1

67

3:2

4

0

6.0

+7%

14

19

3

-5

78

3:4

4

0

5.7

-2%

10

16

6

-6

58

1:3

3

0

4.9

-12%

10

16

2

-6

47

4:3

4

0

4.8

-28%

Total

72

86

15

-14

332

11:13

20

0

5.6

-6%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs Entropiq by the Bo3.gg Team

MIBR on Inferno Analysis

MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MIBR on Inferno were boltz, who contributed 22 kills, and WOOD7, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9417 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Entropiq on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Entropiq, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Entropiq on Inferno included AJTT, who contributed 20 kills, and leckr, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7968 total damage, Entropiq couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Entropiq struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date