Ended
MIBR
0 - 2
ECLOT
Full stats

0 Comments

MIBR Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

15

2

+2

69

3:3

4

0

6.1

+14%

13

13

6

0

83

4:3

3

0

6.1

-2%

16

17

8

-1

75

2:3

3

1

5.8

+1%

17

17

2

0

63

1:2

4

0

5.6

-13%

9

20

4

-11

44

3:2

1

0

4.5

-39%

Total

72

82

22

-10

333

13:13

15

1

5.6

-8%

ECLOT Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

24

15

3

+9

89

0:2

8

0

6.9

+25%

22

12

5

+10

83

0:3

7

0

6.7

+24%

14

12

8

+2

73

5:0

2

0

6.4

-1%

14

17

4

-3

56

3:4

3

0

5.6

-16%

8

17

6

-9

42

5:4

1

0

4.6

-27%

Total

82

73

26

+9

343

13:13

21

0

6.0

+1%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team

ECLOT on Inferno Analysis

ECLOT demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for ECLOT on Inferno were nbqq, who contributed 24 kills, and ZED, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8930 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MIBR on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MIBR, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MIBR on Inferno included brnz4n, who contributed 17 kills, and boltz, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8662 total damage, MIBR couldn't prevent ECLOT from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date