0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
11.13.4
Damage (total/round)
41673
Shots (total/round)
11716
Player score (round)
35191012
Damage (total/round)
38473
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
46%
Nuke
36%
Overpass
33%
Vertigo
33%
Dust II
15%
Mirage
14%
Inferno
7%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
29%
7
1
Nuke
0%
1
26
Overpass
50%
10
9
Vertigo
33%
12
3
Dust II
29%
7
6
Mirage
36%
14
2
Inferno
18%
11
14
Last 5 maps
Ancient
75%
4
1
Nuke
36%
11
3
Overpass
83%
6
2
Vertigo
0%
1
8
Dust II
44%
9
3
Mirage
50%
4
5
Inferno
25%
8
4
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs DETONA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and DETONA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was boltz.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were boltz contributed 22 kills and chelo contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9653 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DETONA analytics
The team DETONA managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DETONA were nqz contributed 20 kills and lux contributed 14 kills. 7388 of total damage by DETONA could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DETONA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments