MIBR Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

21

6

+3

76

4:2

4

0

6.8

+2%

24

14

3

+10

81

3:1

6

0

6.8

+9%

24

20

4

+4

82

7:4

6

1

6.8

+1%

17

12

12

+5

82

2:1

2

0

6.6

+9%

11

17

4

-6

44

0:6

0

0

4.3

-24%

Total

100

84

29

+16

366

16:14

18

1

6.3

-1%

Cruzeiro Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

23

2

-2

85

2:2

6

0

6.1

+4%

16

22

6

-6

75

3:3

4

0

5.9

+3%

18

21

4

-3

64

6:9

5

0

5.5

-11%

13

17

0

-4

49

2:1

3

0

5.0

-6%

15

18

1

-3

44

1:1

3

0

5.0

-13%

Total

83

101

13

-18

317

14:16

21

0

5.5

-5%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs Cruzeiro by the Bo3.gg Team

MIBR on Inferno Analysis

MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MIBR on Inferno were Tuurtle, who contributed 24 kills, and JOTA, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10971 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Cruzeiro on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Cruzeiro, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Cruzeiro on Inferno included TEKO, who contributed 21 kills, and SaNt0S, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9503 total damage, Cruzeiro couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Cruzeiro struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date