0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:18s01:24s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:24s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:23s01:24s
HE kills on a map
21.1189
Galil kills on a map
51.8168
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.86
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
4828
Galil kills on a map
41.8168
Galil damage (avg/round)
24.96
Smoke thrown on a map
1614.3232
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
63%
Ancient
25%
Nuke
16%
Vertigo
10%
Dust II
9%
Inferno
6%
Mirage
4%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
63%
41
5
Ancient
64%
28
10
Nuke
63%
30
24
Vertigo
68%
38
2
Dust II
67%
3
30
Inferno
60%
15
24
Mirage
39%
23
33
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
82
Ancient
39%
41
21
Nuke
47%
43
23
Vertigo
58%
26
18
Dust II
58%
24
27
Inferno
54%
59
8
Mirage
43%
40
18
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs Case by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Case, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was insani.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were insani contributed 17 kills and drop contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7022 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Case analytics
The team Case managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Case were RICIOLI contributed 11 kills and bsd contributed 8 kills. 5030 of total damage by Case could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Case struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments