0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Shots accuracy (%)
45%18%
M4A4 kills on a map
133.6448
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
52.712.7
Damage (total/round)
38873
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Knife kills
11
HE damage (total/round)
12126.8
HE damage (total/round)
11726.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
52%
Nuke
47%
Vertigo
34%
Ancient
29%
Inferno
24%
Overpass
6%
Mirage
5%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
20%
5
7
Nuke
0%
1
22
Vertigo
44%
9
3
Ancient
29%
7
2
Inferno
14%
7
12
Overpass
57%
7
5
Mirage
36%
14
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
72%
36
0
Nuke
47%
19
12
Vertigo
78%
18
1
Ancient
0%
2
21
Inferno
38%
13
33
Overpass
63%
8
29
Mirage
41%
22
4
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and BIG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Nuke, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was syrsoN.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 32 out of 45 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Nuke. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were syrsoN contributed 44 kills and tabseN contributed 40 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17366 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 23 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 13 out of 45 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were exit contributed 29 kills and shz contributed 27 kills. 13106 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments