MIBR Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

11

8

+16

117

4:1

6

1

8.7

+39%

23

10

8

+13

113

3:0

5

0

8.6

+39%

20

10

2

+10

78

5:2

5

1

7.6

+21%

18

11

4

+7

71

3:0

4

0

6.7

+2%

10

12

3

-2

62

2:3

2

1

5.5

-14%

Total

98

54

25

+44

443

17:6

22

3

7.4

+17%

ATK Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

20

2

-5

58

2:2

3

0

5.4

-17%

11

18

1

-7

85

0:4

3

0

5.2

-12%

10

20

3

-10

50

1:5

2

2

4.6

-36%

10

18

3

-8

50

1:4

2

0

4.5

-27%

7

23

5

-16

50

2:2

1

0

4.0

-39%

Total

53

99

14

-46

294

6:17

11

2

4.7

-26%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs ATK by the Bo3.gg Team

MIBR on Anubis Analysis

MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MIBR on Anubis were insani, who contributed 27 kills, and exit, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10179 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ATK on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for ATK, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ATK on Anubis included WolfY, who contributed 15 kills, and reck, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6762 total damage, ATK couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, ATK struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date