Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4398
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.62
Shots (total/round)
8316
Player score (round)
36311012
Shots (total/round)
9916
Shots (total/round)
8416
Player score (round)
36321012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Mirage
67%
Ancient
19%
Dust II
12%
Inferno
11%
Overpass
11%
Nuke
6%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
12
10
Mirage
0%
0
46
Ancient
56%
9
7
Dust II
68%
25
1
Inferno
56%
18
22
Overpass
62%
13
12
Nuke
69%
16
9
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
33
Mirage
67%
15
1
Ancient
75%
8
14
Dust II
80%
10
15
Inferno
45%
11
9
Overpass
73%
11
14
Nuke
75%
20
1
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs 9z by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and 9z, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was max.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were Tuurtle contributed 20 kills and JOTA contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10030 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
9z analytics
The team 9z managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for 9z were max contributed 25 kills and dgt contributed 22 kills. 9986 of total damage by 9z could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, 9z struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments