MIBR Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

11

5

+12

80

5:1

6

1

7.8

+21%

22

14

8

+8

107

3:2

5

0

7.3

+24%

22

12

2

+10

96

4:2

5

0

7.2

+18%

17

13

2

+4

80

1:4

4

0

5.9

+2%

9

14

2

-5

40

0:1

2

0

4.5

-28%

Total

93

64

19

+29

402

13:10

22

1

6.5

+7%

9z Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

19

0

-2

93

3:0

5

0

6.6

+1%

15

21

3

-6

76

4:1

3

0

6.0

-22%

14

16

1

-2

67

2:1

4

0

5.6

-13%

9

17

2

-8

43

0:2

3

1

4.4

-22%

9

20

2

-11

50

1:9

2

1

4.0

-33%

Total

64

93

8

-29

328

10:13

17

2

5.3

-18%

Teams advantage Nuke (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of MIBR vs 9z by the Bo3.gg Team

MIBR on Nuke Analysis

MIBR demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 15 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MIBR on Nuke were brnz4n, who contributed 23 kills, and exit, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9655 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


9z on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for 9z, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for 9z on Nuke included dav1deuS, who contributed 17 kills, and dgt, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7876 total damage, 9z couldn't prevent MIBR from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, 9z struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date