Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:25s01:25s
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.62.1
Smoke thrown on a map
2114.5022
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.14.1
Damage (total/round)
45573
Player score (round)
42181010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
71%
Inferno
21%
Ancient
18%
Anubis
18%
Dust II
10%
Mirage
10%
Nuke
9%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
71%
38
3
Inferno
71%
14
21
Ancient
67%
27
8
Anubis
68%
34
9
Dust II
50%
2
24
Mirage
50%
18
34
Nuke
64%
28
29
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
28
Inferno
50%
10
14
Ancient
85%
13
3
Anubis
50%
20
8
Dust II
60%
20
1
Mirage
60%
15
13
Nuke
55%
29
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs 9z by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and 9z, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Anubis, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was dgt.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were saffee contributed 36 kills and insani contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16706 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
9z analytics
The team 9z managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for 9z were dgt contributed 36 kills and Martinez contributed 30 kills. 16621 of total damage by 9z could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, 9z struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments