0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
41.8171
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Trades on a map
8.363.4638
Speed Round (sec)
00:19s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:26s01:55s
Player score (round)
47821011
Player score (round)
36331011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
50%
Nuke
50%
Mirage
47%
Anubis
26%
Ancient
2%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
2
4
Nuke
50%
16
0
Mirage
72%
18
1
Anubis
71%
14
0
Ancient
71%
17
2
Vertigo
0%
0
7
Last 5 maps
Inferno
50%
6
0
Nuke
0%
2
3
Mirage
25%
12
1
Anubis
45%
11
0
Ancient
73%
11
1
Vertigo
0%
0
3
Last results
Past matches
- wlwww
- wllww
Info
Match analysis of MIBR Academy vs Yawara by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR Academy and Yawara, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by MIBR Academy. The MVP of this match was card.
MIBR Academy analytics
The team MIBR Academy secured 37 out of 57 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Mirage. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR Academy were card contributed 46 kills and max contributed 49 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21505 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Yawara analytics
The team Yawara managed to secure 20 out of 57 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Yawara were ninjaZ contributed 20 kills and ritz contributed 38 kills. 18505 of total damage by Yawara could not prevent MIBR Academy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Yawara struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments