0 Comments
31
70
13
-39
270
5:10
4
0
-17%
70
31
26
+39
474
10:5
19
0
+23%
Teams advantage Dust II (M0)
Records Dust II
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
133
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:25s01:23s
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.32
M4A4 kills on a map
83.3516
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
43.211.7
HE damage (avg/round)
11.33.4
AWP damage (avg/round)
59.921.6
Galil kills on a map
41.8162
Galil damage (avg/round)
20.56
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.82
Info
Map Analysis of MEGA JUNERS vs Supernova Comets by the Bo3.gg Team
Supernova Comets on Dust II Analysis
Supernova Comets demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Supernova Comets on Dust II were Fawx, who contributed 18 kills, and empathy, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 7104 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Supernova Comets held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
MEGA JUNERS on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for MEGA JUNERS, as they managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for MEGA JUNERS on Dust II included heehee, who contributed 11 kills, and ARIANARCHIST, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4045 total damage, MEGA JUNERS couldn't prevent Supernova Comets from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, MEGA JUNERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments