0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.8
5.8
Anubis1
Win Rounds
13
9
Anubis4
Kills
87
66
Anubis21
Damage
9.12K
7.8K
Anubis1321
Economy
487.75K
440.65K
Anubis47100
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
166.4203
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
Speed Round (sec)
00:35s01:55s
Player score (round)
39981010
Player score (round)
38561010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
60%
Anubis
53%
Dust II
50%
Vertigo
50%
Mirage
w
50%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
60%
5
0
Anubis
86%
7
0
Dust II
50%
4
0
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Mirage
50%
6
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
0
Anubis
33%
6
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlww
- wllll
Info
Match analysis of MCS vs who cares by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MCS and who cares, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by MCS. The MVP of this match was snufaffu.
MCS analytics
The team MCS secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MCS were snufaffu contributed 25 kills and Scorchyy contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9122 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MCS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
who cares analytics
The team who cares managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for who cares were Foxl contributed 14 kills and nacluv contributed 13 kills. 7801 of total damage by who cares could not prevent MCS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, who cares struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments