0 Comments
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
57%
Dust II
50%
Vertigo
50%
Nuke
S
40%
Anubis
33%
Ancient
S
25%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
57%
7
0
Dust II
50%
4
0
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Anubis
83%
6
0
Ancient
50%
4
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
40%
5
0
Anubis
50%
2
0
Ancient
75%
4
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwlw
- lllww
Info
Map Analysis of MCS vs Spin da Block by the Bo3.gg Team
MCS on Anubis Analysis
MCS demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for MCS on Anubis were Oczarka, who contributed 19 kills, and Go0dby3, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7814 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, MCS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Spin da Block on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Spin da Block, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Spin da Block on Anubis included kurimakov, who contributed 16 kills, and no1nx, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7898 total damage, Spin da Block couldn't prevent MCS from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Spin da Block struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments