Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
41.8164
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4482
Player score (round)
35521010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
M4A1 kills on a map
104.4189
USP kills on a map
41.6027
Clutch (opponents)
2
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
75%
Dust II
67%
Vertigo
50%
Ancient
27%
Mirage
4%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
75%
4
0
Dust II
67%
3
0
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Ancient
40%
5
0
Mirage
71%
7
0
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Ancient
67%
3
0
Mirage
67%
3
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlwl
- wlwll
Info
Match analysis of MCS vs LazerrFreeks8 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MCS and LazerrFreeks8, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Dust II, Mirage, and victory was secured by MCS. The MVP of this match was Stay_Classy.
MCS analytics
The team MCS secured 26 out of 38 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Mirage. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MCS were Stay_Classy contributed 35 kills and Scorchyy contributed 32 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15689 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MCS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LazerrFreeks8 analytics
The team LazerrFreeks8 managed to secure 12 out of 38 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LazerrFreeks8 were shoosT contributed 24 kills and shitlord5 contributed 26 kills. 12953 of total damage by LazerrFreeks8 could not prevent MCS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LazerrFreeks8 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments