Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
71.8164
USP kills on a map
41.6027
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Assists on a map
11.964.4315
Speed Round (sec)
00:25s01:55s
Player score (round)
35261010
Player score (round)
39711010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
100%
Mirage
67%
Ancient
67%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
100%
2
0
Mirage
67%
3
0
Ancient
33%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
100%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwll
Info
Match analysis of MCS vs HeadShotKings by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MCS and HeadShotKings, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by HeadShotKings. The MVP of this match was mishani.
HeadShotKings analytics
The team HeadShotKings secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HeadShotKings were mishani contributed 28 kills and clipzera contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9590 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HeadShotKings held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MCS analytics
The team MCS managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MCS were snufaffu contributed 23 kills and Go0dby3 contributed 18 kills. 8990 of total damage by MCS could not prevent HeadShotKings from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MCS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments