0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Damage (total/round)
43473
Player score (round)
58031011
Player score (round)
38501011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
AK47 kills on a map
126.5888
AWP kills on a map
176.4849
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
73%
Inferno
62%
Dust II
50%
Mirage
50%
Nuke
47%
Anubis
40%
Ancient
19%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
2
0
Inferno
0%
2
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
2
Nuke
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
3
Ancient
67%
3
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
27%
11
4
Inferno
62%
13
3
Dust II
50%
2
0
Mirage
50%
2
18
Nuke
47%
15
4
Anubis
40%
20
6
Ancient
48%
40
2
Info
Match analysis of MASONIC vs Viperio by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MASONIC and Viperio, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Ancient, and victory was secured by Viperio. The MVP of this match was zodi.
Viperio analytics
The team Viperio secured 29 out of 49 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Ancient. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Viperio were zodi contributed 36 kills and Skrimo contributed 41 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18097 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Viperio held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MASONIC analytics
The team MASONIC managed to secure 20 out of 49 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 7 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MASONIC were Zanto contributed 29 kills and fr0slev contributed 28 kills. 16076 of total damage by MASONIC could not prevent Viperio from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MASONIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments