0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.2
6.5
Inferno0.3
Win Rounds
14
16
Inferno2
Kills
103
112
Inferno9
Damage
11.71K
11.88K
Inferno177
Economy
597.2K
630K
Inferno32800
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
84%
Overpass
64%
Ancient
P
46%
Dust II
P
19%
Nuke
P
5%
Inferno
4%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
84%
31
3
Overpass
64%
33
9
Ancient
54%
26
12
Dust II
48%
25
14
Nuke
45%
22
17
Inferno
64%
45
7
Mirage
0%
3
35
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Overpass
0%
2
0
Ancient
100%
1
1
Dust II
67%
6
0
Nuke
50%
2
1
Inferno
60%
5
0
Mirage
0%
0
2
Info
Match analysis of MASONIC vs PIGNOUF by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MASONIC and PIGNOUF, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by PIGNOUF. The MVP of this match was Buzz.
PIGNOUF analytics
The team PIGNOUF secured 30 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PIGNOUF were Razzmo contributed 30 kills and Kursy contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11882 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PIGNOUF held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MASONIC analytics
The team MASONIC managed to secure 0 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MASONIC were Buzz contributed 28 kills and Anlelele contributed 22 kills. 11705 of total damage by MASONIC could not prevent PIGNOUF from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MASONIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments