0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:22s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:35s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:17s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
39373
Player score (round)
40181011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
75%
Mirage
52%
Anubis
44%
Vertigo
40%
Inferno
38%
Nuke
20%
Ancient
2%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
2
3
Anubis
0%
1
4
Vertigo
67%
6
0
Inferno
0%
4
0
Nuke
20%
5
0
Ancient
38%
8
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
75%
4
0
Mirage
52%
27
0
Anubis
44%
25
3
Vertigo
27%
11
3
Inferno
38%
8
4
Nuke
0%
2
10
Ancient
40%
35
0
Info
Match analysis of MASONIC vs NOM by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MASONIC and NOM, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Nuke, Dust II, and victory was secured by NOM. The MVP of this match was Botman.
NOM analytics
The team NOM secured 27 out of 61 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Dust II. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NOM were m4tthi contributed 47 kills and Schwarz contributed 43 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21584 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NOM held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MASONIC analytics
The team MASONIC managed to secure 34 out of 61 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MASONIC were Botman contributed 50 kills and Noruyp contributed 47 kills. 22967 of total damage by MASONIC could not prevent NOM from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MASONIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments