0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
100%
Dust II
60%
Mirage
56%
Overpass
53%
Vertigo
14%
Nuke
14%
Inferno
7%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
100%
1
7
Dust II
60%
15
17
Mirage
11%
9
49
Overpass
53%
34
10
Vertigo
64%
47
3
Nuke
36%
25
25
Inferno
57%
70
2
Ancient
50%
26
27
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
8
Dust II
0%
0
0
Mirage
67%
9
2
Overpass
0%
5
8
Vertigo
50%
2
7
Nuke
50%
14
0
Inferno
50%
16
1
Ancient
50%
2
6
Last results
Past matches
- lwwww
- lllww
Info
Match analysis of MASONIC vs Invictus International by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MASONIC and Invictus International, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, Overpass, and victory was secured by Invictus International. The MVP of this match was facecrack.
Invictus International analytics
The team Invictus International secured 49 out of 49 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Nuke. They also successfully set 10 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Invictus International were facecrack contributed 53 kills and m1N1 contributed 47 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19154 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Invictus International held their ground firmly, successfully defending 25 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MASONIC analytics
The team MASONIC managed to secure 0 out of 49 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MASONIC were Anlelele contributed 37 kills and JarKo contributed 38 kills. 18129 of total damage by MASONIC could not prevent Invictus International from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MASONIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments