MASONIC Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

20

7

+3

89

3:3

6

1

6.8

+11%

16

19

5

-3

67

3:4

2

1

5.9

-13%

19

20

2

-1

68

1:2

6

0

5.7

+1%

16

21

4

-5

70

5:5

4

0

5.6

-11%

14

23

4

-9

54

0:3

3

0

5.0

-25%

Total

88

103

22

-15

347

12:17

21

2

5.8

-7%

CYBERSHOKE Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

15

6

+7

79

2:1

5

1

6.9

+19%

23

18

8

+5

91

4:4

5

0

6.8

+26%

22

16

7

+6

83

1:1

5

1

6.7

+21%

22

22

9

0

76

6:3

7

0

6.7

-2%

14

18

5

-4

55

4:3

2

0

5.3

-10%

Total

103

89

35

+14

385

17:12

24

2

6.5

+11%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of MASONIC vs CYBERSHOKE by the Bo3.gg Team

CYBERSHOKE on Anubis Analysis

CYBERSHOKE demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Anubis were FenomeN, who contributed 22 kills, and kelieN, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 11158 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MASONIC on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for MASONIC, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MASONIC on Anubis included Zanto, who contributed 23 kills, and Botman, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10073 total damage, MASONIC couldn't prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, MASONIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date