MASONIC Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

12

3

+9

104

6:2

5

2

8.0

+34%

18

14

6

+4

90

5:2

4

1

7.4

+11%

17

13

5

+4

69

0:3

4

1

6.0

+11%

15

12

4

+3

81

1:1

3

0

6.0

+12%

11

16

2

-5

50

2:1

3

0

5.1

-19%

Total

82

67

20

+15

394

14:9

19

4

6.5

+10%

BLUEJAYS Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

17

1

+4

90

4:1

8

0

7.2

+12%

18

16

2

+2

89

3:2

5

0

6.7

-1%

10

17

4

-7

60

1:1

3

0

5.3

-17%

11

14

3

-3

56

1:3

4

0

5.2

-17%

5

18

1

-13

32

0:7

1

0

3.1

-43%

Total

65

82

11

-17

327

9:14

21

0

5.5

-13%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of MASONIC vs BLUEJAYS by the Bo3.gg Team

MASONIC on Inferno Analysis

MASONIC demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for MASONIC on Inferno were Tauson, who contributed 21 kills, and j3nsyy, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9055 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, MASONIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


BLUEJAYS on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for BLUEJAYS, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for BLUEJAYS on Inferno included xicoz, who contributed 21 kills, and CacaNito, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7532 total damage, BLUEJAYS couldn't prevent MASONIC from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, BLUEJAYS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date