0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.1
5.9
Overpass0.2
Win Rounds
16
10
Overpass6
Kills
85
80
Overpass5
Damage
9.38K
9.35K
Overpass37
Economy
558.35K
543.1K
Overpass15250
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
L
42%
Dust II
33%
Vertigo
33%
Ancient
22%
Overpass
6%
Mirage
L
2%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
25%
4
1
Dust II
33%
3
0
Vertigo
33%
3
1
Ancient
22%
9
0
Overpass
56%
18
0
Mirage
55%
11
1
Last 5 maps
Inferno
67%
3
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Overpass
50%
4
0
Mirage
57%
7
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of Marskalk vs LookingForOrg EU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Marskalk and LookingForOrg EU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by Marskalk. The MVP of this match was dZ.
Marskalk analytics
The team Marskalk secured 26 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Marskalk were dZ contributed 21 kills and treckiz contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9522 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Marskalk held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LookingForOrg EU analytics
The team LookingForOrg EU managed to secure 0 out of 26 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LookingForOrg EU were R0b3n contributed 21 kills and L1GH7n1nG contributed 17 kills. 9346 of total damage by LookingForOrg EU could not prevent Marskalk from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LookingForOrg EU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments