79
96
22
-17
386
9:15
17
1
-3%
96
79
16
+17
433
15:9
26
1
+13%
Teams advantage Dust II (M0)
Records Dust II
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Headshots (total/map)
228
AK47 kills on a map
156.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
60.225.3
Deagle kills on a map
51.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
225.4
Percentage of headshots
44%15%
USP kills on a map
51.616
USP damage (avg/round)
17.64.6
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
15.93.8
Kills on a map
40.0817.5558
Info
Map Analysis of markeloff's Team vs Edward's Team by the Bo3.gg Team
Edward's Team on Dust II Analysis
Edward's Team demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Edward's Team on Dust II were headtr1ck, who contributed 40 kills, and Edward, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 10389 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Edward's Team held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
markeloff's Team on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for markeloff's Team, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for markeloff's Team on Dust II included 1mpala, who contributed 26 kills, and Konoplyanka, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9273 total damage, markeloff's Team couldn't prevent Edward's Team from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, markeloff's Team struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments