Malvinas Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

23

9

-2

91

6:3

5

0

6.7

+16%

24

19

3

+5

73

2:2

6

0

6.5

+7%

19

19

3

0

62

5:3

4

0

6.0

-10%

16

20

5

-4

72

2:3

4

1

5.9

-11%

15

20

7

-5

69

1:2

4

0

5.4

-2%

Total

95

101

27

-6

367

16:13

23

1

6.1

0%

PAMPAS Scoreboard Inferno (M3)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

28

18

3

+10

108

3:1

6

0

7.6

+42%

23

18

5

+5

80

3:2

8

0

6.5

+6%

16

21

7

-5

64

3:3

3

1

5.8

-5%

18

18

3

0

65

0:3

6

0

5.5

+1%

15

20

2

-5

58

4:7

4

0

5.0

-9%

Total

100

95

20

+5

376

13:16

27

1

6.1

+7%

Teams advantage Inferno (M3)
Info
Map Analysis of Malvinas vs PAMPAS by the Bo3.gg Team

PAMPAS on Inferno Analysis

PAMPAS demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for PAMPAS on Inferno were PREDI, who contributed 28 kills, and pavv, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10899 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, PAMPAS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Malvinas on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Malvinas, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Malvinas on Inferno included gAtito, who contributed 21 kills, and peqexino, who added 24 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10630 total damage, Malvinas couldn't prevent PAMPAS from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Malvinas struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date