0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6
6.6
Mirage0.6
Win Rounds
30
35
Mirage2
Kills
223
236
Mirage6
Damage
24.29K
26.06K
Mirage719
Economy
1.37M
1.42M
Mirage43450
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
64%
Overpass
50%
Nuke
50%
Vertigo
43%
Ancient
43%
Mirage
22%
Dust II
17%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
1
Overpass
0%
0
1
Nuke
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
2
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
64%
11
3
Overpass
50%
12
2
Nuke
50%
2
14
Vertigo
43%
7
0
Ancient
43%
7
8
Mirage
22%
9
9
Dust II
17%
6
10
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llllw
Info
Match analysis of Post Mortem vs Mythic by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Post Mortem and Mythic, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, and victory was secured by Mythic. The MVP of this match was hate.
Mythic analytics
The team Mythic secured 0 out of 65 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Mythic were hate contributed 56 kills and tweiss contributed 48 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26064 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Mythic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Post Mortem analytics
The team Post Mortem managed to secure 65 out of 65 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Post Mortem were Slash contributed 53 kills and VulcaN contributed 52 kills. 24294 of total damage by Post Mortem could not prevent Mythic from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Post Mortem struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 33 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments