MAD Lions Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

21

4

+1

76

4:3

7

0

6.3

-1%

20

17

4

+3

67

2:1

5

0

6.2

+1%

17

23

3

-6

72

1:1

4

0

5.7

-8%

10

20

4

-10

50

2:3

4

0

4.7

-32%

10

24

4

-14

46

3:9

2

0

4.1

-35%

Total

79

105

19

-26

312

12:17

22

0

5.4

-15%

SKADE Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

30

12

5

+18

103

4:1

9

0

8.2

+42%

25

15

4

+10

91

3:2

6

0

7.1

+33%

20

15

4

+5

70

5:3

4

0

6.3

+2%

17

20

8

-3

70

4:2

5

1

6.2

-9%

12

19

3

-7

48

1:4

3

0

4.7

-19%

Total

104

81

24

+23

382

17:12

27

1

6.5

+10%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of MAD Lions vs SKADE by the Bo3.gg Team

SKADE on Inferno Analysis

SKADE demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SKADE on Inferno were Rainwaker, who contributed 30 kills, and Duplicate, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11079 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, SKADE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MAD Lions on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for MAD Lions, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MAD Lions on Inferno included jL, who contributed 22 kills, and sausol, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9034 total damage, MAD Lions couldn't prevent SKADE from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, MAD Lions struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date