0 Comments
294
260
80
+34
395
39:43
71
11
Dust II5.8
+4%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
50%
Inferno
40%
Nuke
20%
Dust II
5%
Overpass
3%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
7
Inferno
0%
1
4
Nuke
40%
5
0
Dust II
75%
4
4
Overpass
60%
5
2
Mirage
50%
4
2
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
50%
6
1
Inferno
40%
5
1
Nuke
60%
5
3
Dust II
80%
5
1
Overpass
57%
7
5
Mirage
50%
4
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwll
- wllll
Info
Match analysis of MAD Lions vs Lyngby Vikings by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MAD Lions and Lyngby Vikings, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Overpass, Dust II, Nuke, and victory was secured by Lyngby Vikings. The MVP of this match was raalz.
Lyngby Vikings analytics
The team Lyngby Vikings secured 49 out of 82 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Nuke. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Lyngby Vikings were raalz contributed 84 kills and Daffu contributed 74 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 31689 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Lyngby Vikings held their ground firmly, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MAD Lions analytics
The team MAD Lions managed to secure 33 out of 82 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MAD Lions were sausol contributed 48 kills and tudsoN contributed 57 kills. 29607 of total damage by MAD Lions could not prevent Lyngby Vikings from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MAD Lions struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments