0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:26s
M4A1 kills on a map
134.491
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
59.816.3
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.53.5
USP kills on a map
31.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
15.44.7
Molotov kills on a map
21.0811
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.22
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:03s00:37s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
40%
Inferno
33%
Anubis
27%
Ancient
25%
Vertigo
13%
Nuke
4%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
54%
13
34
Inferno
33%
15
25
Anubis
56%
18
20
Ancient
71%
28
6
Vertigo
88%
24
5
Nuke
56%
9
28
Last 5 maps
Mirage
14%
7
12
Inferno
0%
1
21
Anubis
29%
7
4
Ancient
46%
13
8
Vertigo
75%
4
13
Nuke
60%
5
4
Info
Match analysis of M80 vs LAG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between M80 and LAG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by M80. The MVP of this match was malbsMd.
M80 analytics
The team M80 secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for M80 were malbsMd contributed 23 kills and slaxz- contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7358 overall damage.
On the defensive side, M80 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LAG analytics
The team LAG managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LAG were Nyyx contributed 12 kills and ogwizard contributed 10 kills. 5721 of total damage by LAG could not prevent M80 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LAG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments