0 Comments
Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
83%
Ancient
56%
Nuke
50%
Vertigo
40%
Inferno
35%
Dust II
3%
Anubis
3%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
18
Ancient
56%
18
2
Nuke
50%
10
2
Vertigo
60%
5
7
Inferno
60%
15
5
Dust II
68%
19
0
Anubis
36%
14
2
Last 5 maps
Mirage
83%
6
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Nuke
100%
1
0
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Inferno
25%
4
0
Dust II
71%
7
0
Anubis
33%
3
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwww
- lwwww
Info
Map Analysis of Lynn Vision vs SGGT by the Bo3.gg Team
SGGT on Anubis Analysis
SGGT demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for SGGT on Anubis were ZinGY, who contributed 28 kills, and lame, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8028 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, SGGT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Lynn Vision on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Lynn Vision, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Lynn Vision on Anubis included Westmelon, who contributed 17 kills, and flying, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5960 total damage, Lynn Vision couldn't prevent SGGT from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Lynn Vision struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments