0 Comments
51
80
10
-29
321
10:9
12
2
-24%
Teams advantage Vertigo (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Stand-in
Stand-in
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Ancient
19%
Anubis
17%
Dust II
14%
Inferno
7%
Nuke
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
6
7
Ancient
50%
18
2
Anubis
47%
15
2
Dust II
71%
17
0
Inferno
63%
16
7
Nuke
50%
10
3
Mirage
0%
0
21
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
3
Ancient
69%
16
0
Anubis
64%
11
1
Dust II
57%
7
2
Inferno
70%
10
0
Nuke
50%
6
0
Mirage
0%
0
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwll
- lwlww
Info
Map Analysis of Lynn Vision vs IHC by the Bo3.gg Team
Lynn Vision on Vertigo Analysis
Lynn Vision demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Lynn Vision on Vertigo were EmiliaQAQ, who contributed 22 kills, and z4kr, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 8280 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Lynn Vision held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
IHC on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for IHC, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for IHC on Vertigo included cRYSTALx, who contributed 14 kills, and Zesta, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6094 total damage, IHC couldn't prevent Lynn Vision from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, IHC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments