M1 Scoreboard Mirage (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

19

4

-3

95

3:2

4

1

6.8

+33%

14

17

3

-3

65

3:4

2

0

5.7

+2%

13

17

2

-4

65

0:1

3

0

5.5

-4%

9

19

4

-10

60

1:3

2

0

4.9

-9%

6

18

1

-12

28

3:2

0

0

4.2

-46%

Total

58

90

14

-32

313

10:12

11

1

5.4

-5%

Lyngby Vikings Scoreboard Mirage (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

12

5

+10

101

3:2

8

1

7.8

+39%

22

11

6

+11

107

0:3

8

1

7.5

+48%

21

12

6

+9

92

5:1

6

0

7.5

+27%

17

11

5

+6

84

4:2

3

1

7.0

+18%

8

12

2

-4

48

0:2

1

1

4.7

-23%

Total

90

58

24

+32

433

12:10

26

4

6.9

+22%

Teams advantage Mirage (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of M1 vs Lyngby Vikings by the Bo3.gg Team

Lyngby Vikings on Mirage Analysis

Lyngby Vikings demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Lyngby Vikings on Mirage were FASHR, who contributed 22 kills, and birdfromsky, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 9535 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Mirage, Lyngby Vikings held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


M1 on Mirage Analysis

Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for M1, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for M1 on Mirage included OLIMP, who contributed 16 kills, and Crityourface, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6883 total damage, M1 couldn't prevent Lyngby Vikings from securing victory on Mirage


On the defensive side of Mirage, M1 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date