0 Comments
88
101
24
-13
342
13:16
19
0
-8%
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:53s00:39s
Player score (round)
37611012
Shots (total/round)
10316
Shots (total/round)
10416
Multikill x-
4
Molotov damage (total/round)
10023.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:20s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:18s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Info
Map Analysis of Lyngby Vikings vs FunPlus Phoenix by the Bo3.gg Team
FunPlus Phoenix on Inferno Analysis
FunPlus Phoenix demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for FunPlus Phoenix on Inferno were emi, who contributed 27 kills, and zehN, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10821 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, FunPlus Phoenix held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Lyngby Vikings on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Lyngby Vikings, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Lyngby Vikings on Inferno included FASHR, who contributed 21 kills, and Daffu, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9926 total damage, Lyngby Vikings couldn't prevent FunPlus Phoenix from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Lyngby Vikings struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments