0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:54s
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:54s
Player score (round)
36371011
Damage (total/round)
38773
Player score (round)
37571011
Player score (round)
39651011
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
100%
Vertigo
67%
Overpass
50%
Nuke
50%
Ancient
38%
Mirage
13%
Anubis
7%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
2
1
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Overpass
50%
4
0
Nuke
0%
0
3
Ancient
0%
2
3
Mirage
50%
6
0
Anubis
60%
5
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Overpass
100%
1
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Ancient
38%
8
0
Mirage
63%
8
0
Anubis
67%
6
0
Info
Match analysis of LYG vs The QUBE by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LYG and The QUBE, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by LYG. The MVP of this match was lame.
LYG analytics
The team LYG secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LYG were lame contributed 19 kills and AceX contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9015 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LYG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
The QUBE analytics
The team The QUBE managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for The QUBE were hoolig4n contributed 20 kills and gl_247 contributed 16 kills. 7669 of total damage by The QUBE could not prevent LYG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, The QUBE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments