0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Assists on a map
124.3808
Openning kills on a map
82.8849
Speed Round (sec)
00:32s01:54s
Speed Round (sec)
00:20s01:54s
Speed Round (sec)
00:18s01:54s
Player score (round)
35481011
Player score (round)
35191011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
72%
Nuke
69%
Vertigo
67%
Anubis
67%
Inferno
43%
Mirage
33%
Overpass
17%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
3
Nuke
0%
0
3
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Anubis
0%
2
0
Inferno
100%
2
1
Mirage
40%
5
0
Overpass
50%
4
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
72%
18
1
Nuke
69%
16
0
Vertigo
0%
1
14
Anubis
67%
12
8
Inferno
57%
7
5
Mirage
73%
15
10
Overpass
33%
3
3
Info
Match analysis of LYG vs ATOX by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LYG and ATOX, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by LYG. The MVP of this match was lame.
LYG analytics
The team LYG secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LYG were lame contributed 20 kills and ZinGY contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8421 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LYG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ATOX analytics
The team ATOX managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ATOX were flyNN contributed 16 kills and dobu contributed 14 kills. 7432 of total damage by ATOX could not prevent LYG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ATOX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments