Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
113
HE damage (avg/round)
11.43.4
Player score (round)
38201012
Player score (round)
35171012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
HE damage (total/round)
9826.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
73%
Vertigo
64%
Overpass
56%
Inferno
27%
Ancient
26%
Nuke
2%
Mirage
1%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
4
6
Vertigo
0%
0
7
Overpass
56%
9
2
Inferno
67%
12
1
Ancient
62%
13
1
Nuke
33%
6
5
Mirage
57%
7
4
Last 5 maps
Anubis
73%
22
4
Vertigo
64%
11
9
Overpass
0%
0
47
Inferno
40%
15
28
Ancient
88%
25
2
Nuke
35%
20
15
Mirage
58%
19
9
Info
Match analysis of LRV vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LRV and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Anubis, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was togs.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 32 out of 51 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Anubis. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were togs contributed 45 kills and rdnzao contributed 41 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19378 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LRV analytics
The team LRV managed to secure 19 out of 51 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LRV were christo contributed 37 kills and reversive contributed 34 kills. 16857 of total damage by LRV could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LRV struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments