0 Comments
59
82
16
-23
305
12:10
11
0
Anubis5.4
-12%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:28s01:55s
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
100%
Vertigo
75%
Nuke
67%
Mirage
50%
Ancient
24%
Anubis
4%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
25%
4
0
Nuke
100%
1
0
Mirage
100%
4
0
Ancient
64%
14
0
Anubis
57%
7
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
3
Vertigo
100%
4
2
Nuke
33%
3
1
Mirage
50%
6
1
Ancient
40%
10
0
Anubis
53%
17
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwww
- lwwww
Info
Match analysis of los kogutos vs CYBERSHOKE by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between los kogutos and CYBERSHOKE, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by CYBERSHOKE. The MVP of this match was kelieN.
CYBERSHOKE analytics
The team CYBERSHOKE secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE were kelieN contributed 19 kills and FenomeN contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8215 overall damage.
On the defensive side, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
los kogutos analytics
The team los kogutos managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for los kogutos were -_Chudy contributed 13 kills and eltrzzi contributed 13 kills. 6717 of total damage by los kogutos could not prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing the victory
On the defensive side, los kogutos struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments