Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
206.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
60.221.6
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
42271012
Player score (round)
38121012
Player score (round)
38281012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
5
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
53%
Vertigo
47%
Ancient
40%
Nuke
18%
Dust II
11%
Inferno
6%
Mirage
4%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
67%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
1
6
Ancient
0%
1
4
Nuke
0%
1
2
Dust II
40%
5
0
Inferno
60%
5
2
Mirage
50%
2
5
Last 5 maps
Overpass
14%
7
16
Vertigo
47%
19
2
Ancient
40%
10
11
Nuke
18%
11
22
Dust II
51%
37
0
Inferno
66%
44
0
Mirage
46%
13
10
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of LOS vs SWS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LOS and SWS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by SWS. The MVP of this match was bsd.
SWS analytics
The team SWS secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SWS were bsd contributed 23 kills and w1 contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10028 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SWS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LOS analytics
The team LOS managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LOS were mawth contributed 21 kills and shz contributed 25 kills. 10570 of total damage by LOS could not prevent SWS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LOS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments