0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
NaN
6.7
Dust II6.8
Win Rounds
0
32
Dust II10
Kills
0
195
Dust II33
Damage
0
20.99K
Dust II2807
Economy
0
1.14M
Dust II113650
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
L
72%
Dust II
L
36%
Mirage
36%
Inferno
L
30%
Vertigo
L
23%
Nuke
L
22%
Ancient
L
4%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
72%
18
6
Dust II
69%
13
11
Mirage
0%
2
49
Inferno
75%
8
11
Vertigo
79%
14
19
Nuke
81%
16
9
Ancient
71%
7
7
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
26
Dust II
33%
6
17
Mirage
36%
11
10
Inferno
45%
11
8
Vertigo
56%
9
6
Nuke
59%
17
3
Ancient
67%
6
8
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllll
- llwll
Info
Match analysis of Looking For Org vs MOUZ by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Looking For Org and MOUZ, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Dust II, Nuke, and victory was secured by MOUZ. The MVP of this match was Bymas.
MOUZ analytics
The team MOUZ secured 32 out of 50 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Nuke. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MOUZ were Bymas contributed 54 kills and dexter contributed 45 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20988 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MOUZ held their ground firmly, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Looking For Org analytics
The team Looking For Org managed to secure 0 out of 50 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Looking For Org were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by Looking For Org could not prevent MOUZ from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Looking For Org struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments