0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
7
5.7
Inferno1.3
Win Rounds
16
11
Inferno5
Kills
111
83
Inferno28
Damage
12.03K
9.93K
Inferno2096
Economy
592.3K
517.95K
Inferno74350
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
84%
Mirage
L
63%
Dust II
L
52%
Nuke
45%
Ancient
34%
Overpass
24%
Inferno
L
2%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
63%
8
0
Dust II
100%
2
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Ancient
20%
5
0
Overpass
40%
5
0
Inferno
67%
6
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
84%
31
3
Mirage
0%
3
35
Dust II
48%
25
14
Nuke
45%
22
17
Ancient
54%
26
12
Overpass
64%
33
9
Inferno
65%
43
7
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwlw
- lwwww
Info
Match analysis of LookingForOrg EU vs MASONIC by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LookingForOrg EU and MASONIC, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by LookingForOrg EU. The MVP of this match was AW.
LookingForOrg EU analytics
The team LookingForOrg EU secured 27 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LookingForOrg EU were AW contributed 32 kills and alpha contributed 30 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 12026 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LookingForOrg EU held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MASONIC analytics
The team MASONIC managed to secure 0 out of 27 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MASONIC were Tauson contributed 19 kills and notaN contributed 21 kills. 9930 of total damage by MASONIC could not prevent LookingForOrg EU from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MASONIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments