Looking4Org Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

15

3

+4

68

1:2

5

1

6.3

-3%

15

14

2

+1

56

2:0

2

0

5.7

-6%

17

18

3

-1

66

1:5

3

0

5.5

-6%

12

22

3

-10

54

5:8

3

0

5.0

-28%

7

17

8

-10

47

1:0

0

0

4.7

-34%

Total

70

86

19

-16

290

10:15

13

1

5.4

-15%

fnatic Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

15

7

+3

85

4:2

4

1

6.8

+16%

21

13

4

+8

80

3:2

4

0

6.7

+18%

17

17

4

0

73

3:2

4

0

6.1

-1%

15

13

2

+2

46

3:2

2

2

5.9

-10%

15

12

5

+3

61

2:2

4

0

5.5

+1%

Total

86

70

22

+16

345

15:10

18

3

6.2

+5%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Looking4Org vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team

fnatic on Anubis Analysis

fnatic demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for fnatic on Anubis were FASHR, who contributed 18 kills, and nicoodoz, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8975 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Looking4Org on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Looking4Org, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Looking4Org on Anubis included Maka, who contributed 19 kills, and Ex3rcice, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7528 total damage, Looking4Org couldn't prevent fnatic from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Looking4Org struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date