0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
100%
Nuke
l
100%
Ancient
l
100%
Mirage
l
83%
Dust II
75%
Inferno
l
60%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Nuke
100%
1
0
Ancient
100%
1
0
Mirage
100%
2
0
Dust II
0%
1
1
Inferno
100%
1
1
Overpass
0%
0
3
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
1
8
Nuke
0%
2
6
Ancient
0%
0
5
Mirage
17%
6
0
Dust II
75%
4
3
Inferno
40%
5
1
Overpass
0%
2
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- ww
- llllw
Info
Match analysis of lol123 vs Caught off Guard by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between lol123 and Caught off Guard, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Nuke, Mirage, Dust II, and victory was secured by lol123. The MVP of this match was Mayker.
lol123 analytics
The team lol123 secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for lol123 were Mayker contributed 67 kills and gump contributed 62 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 33072 overall damage.
On the defensive side, lol123 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Caught off Guard analytics
The team Caught off Guard managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Caught off Guard were mega2F contributed 64 kills and viridian contributed 54 kills. 29932 of total damage by Caught off Guard could not prevent lol123 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Caught off Guard struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments