0 Comments
Teams advantage Ancient (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
71%
Ancient
57%
Vertigo
50%
Nuke
50%
Mirage
44%
Anubis
40%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
9
0
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Anubis
40%
5
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
71%
7
1
Ancient
57%
28
0
Vertigo
50%
4
1
Nuke
0%
0
4
Mirage
44%
9
0
Anubis
0%
7
0
Dust II
0%
0
2
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllll
- lwllw
Info
Map Analysis of LODIS vs CPH Wolves by the Bo3.gg Team
CPH Wolves on Ancient Analysis
CPH Wolves demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CPH Wolves on Ancient were BøghmagiC, who contributed 25 kills, and Fessor, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 9020 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
LODIS on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for LODIS, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for LODIS on Ancient included Fugor, who contributed 24 kills, and aimy, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8665 total damage, LODIS couldn't prevent CPH Wolves from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, LODIS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments