0 Comments
66
77
26
-11
362
10:10
15
2
0%
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
L
71%
Ancient
T
67%
Anubis
L
47%
Vertigo
0%
Nuke
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
71%
7
1
Ancient
0%
3
1
Anubis
47%
15
1
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Nuke
0%
2
0
Mirage
0%
0
2
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Ancient
67%
3
0
Anubis
0%
4
0
Vertigo
0%
4
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllww
- lwlll
Info
Map Analysis of LOADING vs TopTab Club by the Bo3.gg Team
LOADING on Anubis Analysis
LOADING demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for LOADING on Anubis were Razn, who contributed 19 kills, and HippoV, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7877 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, LOADING held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
TopTab Club on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for TopTab Club, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for TopTab Club on Anubis included maQuein, who contributed 17 kills, and ADntZzZz, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7232 total damage, TopTab Club couldn't prevent LOADING from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, TopTab Club struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments