Liquid Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

18

8

+7

90

3:2

4

0

7.1

+10%

22

19

3

+3

90

2:2

4

0

6.5

+14%

19

20

0

-1

64

1:5

5

0

5.4

-13%

14

19

7

-5

65

2:8

4

0

5.0

-12%

12

19

5

-7

49

2:2

4

0

4.9

-22%

Total

92

95

23

-3

358

10:19

21

0

5.8

-4%

GODSENT Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

27

20

4

+7

101

5:4

7

0

7.3

+10%

19

17

5

+2

76

4:1

3

0

6.2

0%

15

19

7

-4

57

5:0

4

2

6.2

-9%

16

21

5

-5

62

1:1

5

0

5.4

-18%

15

17

2

-2

51

4:4

2

1

5.4

-22%

Total

92

94

23

-2

347

19:10

21

3

6.1

-8%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Liquid vs GODSENT by the Bo3.gg Team

GODSENT on Inferno Analysis

GODSENT demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for GODSENT on Inferno were felps, who contributed 27 kills, and latto, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10397 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, GODSENT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Liquid on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Liquid, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Liquid on Inferno included NAF, who contributed 25 kills, and Grim, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10753 total damage, Liquid couldn't prevent GODSENT from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Liquid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date