0 Comments
43
85
10
-42
294
5:14
8
0
0%
Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
75%
Overpass
50%
Inferno
48%
Mirage
41%
Ancient
41%
Nuke
30%
Dust II
19%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
3
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Dust II
50%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
75%
4
5
Overpass
50%
16
1
Inferno
48%
27
5
Mirage
41%
27
2
Ancient
41%
22
0
Nuke
30%
10
8
Dust II
31%
16
8
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lll
- wllll
Info
Map Analysis of Linx Legacy D vs Lilmix by the Bo3.gg Team
Lilmix on Dust II Analysis
Lilmix demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 0 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Lilmix on Dust II were bq, who contributed 20 kills, and Jackinho, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8835 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Lilmix held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Linx Legacy D on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Linx Legacy D, as they managed to secure 19 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Linx Legacy D on Dust II included rommi, who contributed 11 kills, and lUMiER, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5535 total damage, Linx Legacy D couldn't prevent Lilmix from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Linx Legacy D struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments