0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Player score (round)
36201010
Damage (total/round)
43873
Player score (round)
34751010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Zeus kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Mirage
61%
Vertigo
50%
Nuke
38%
Anubis
27%
Inferno
21%
Ancient
11%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
3
Mirage
61%
33
0
Vertigo
50%
6
6
Nuke
0%
2
5
Anubis
40%
25
3
Inferno
50%
16
3
Ancient
44%
34
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
2
0
Mirage
0%
0
3
Vertigo
0%
2
1
Nuke
38%
13
0
Anubis
67%
12
1
Inferno
71%
7
0
Ancient
55%
11
1
Info
Match analysis of Lilmix vs GenOne by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Lilmix and GenOne, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by GenOne. The MVP of this match was PALM1.
GenOne analytics
The team GenOne secured 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GenOne were drac contributed 27 kills and Kursy contributed 25 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11053 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GenOne held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Lilmix analytics
The team Lilmix managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Lilmix were PALM1 contributed 29 kills and dex contributed 21 kills. 10558 of total damage by Lilmix could not prevent GenOne from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Lilmix struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments