0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
14.43.4
M4A4 kills on a map
103.6448
Galil kills on a map
51.8064
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.55.6
USP damage (avg/round)
16.64.6
Assists on a map
16.124.3517
Trades on a map
10.923.5084
Openning kills on a map
10.922.9135
Shots (total/round)
8316
Player score (round)
39651012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
54%
Ancient
50%
Overpass
25%
Nuke
25%
Inferno
23%
Vertigo
20%
Dust II
3%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
1
8
Ancient
0%
0
9
Overpass
33%
3
4
Nuke
50%
6
6
Inferno
83%
6
1
Vertigo
0%
0
9
Dust II
71%
7
1
Last 5 maps
Mirage
46%
13
5
Ancient
50%
6
10
Overpass
8%
12
20
Nuke
25%
4
26
Inferno
60%
15
1
Vertigo
20%
10
12
Dust II
68%
25
0
Info
Match analysis of Leviatan vs INTZ by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Leviatan and INTZ, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Leviatan. The MVP of this match was 1962.
Leviatan analytics
The team Leviatan secured 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Leviatan were 1962 contributed 23 kills and pavv contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11107 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Leviatan held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
INTZ analytics
The team INTZ managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for INTZ were Ikki contributed 26 kills and mcl contributed 19 kills. 10358 of total damage by INTZ could not prevent Leviatan from securing the victory
On the defensive side, INTZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments