Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.616
USP damage (avg/round)
14.34.6
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.53.8
Player score (round)
39991012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
65%
Ancient
58%
Mirage
37%
Vertigo
29%
Dust II
27%
Inferno
20%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
65%
26
2
Ancient
42%
12
22
Mirage
46%
24
16
Vertigo
38%
16
11
Dust II
60%
20
4
Inferno
60%
30
0
Overpass
0%
0
49
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
7
Ancient
100%
1
8
Mirage
83%
6
0
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Dust II
33%
3
2
Inferno
40%
5
0
Overpass
0%
3
1
Info
Match analysis of LDLC vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between LDLC and ECLOT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Mirage, Inferno, Dust II, and victory was secured by LDLC. The MVP of this match was hAdji.
LDLC analytics
The team LDLC secured 43 out of 73 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Dust II. They also successfully set 10 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LDLC were hAdji contributed 63 kills and Maka contributed 53 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 27915 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LDLC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT managed to secure 30 out of 73 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ECLOT were Valencio contributed 62 kills and ZED contributed 47 kills. 26500 of total damage by ECLOT could not prevent LDLC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments