0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
57%
Inferno
50%
Ancient
33%
Mirage
20%
Dust II
11%
Anubis
7%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
57%
7
2
Inferno
0%
5
0
Ancient
33%
3
2
Mirage
40%
5
0
Dust II
67%
3
0
Anubis
40%
5
1
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
0
Inferno
50%
6
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Mirage
20%
5
0
Dust II
56%
9
0
Anubis
33%
6
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwww
- wlwlw
Info
Map Analysis of Lazer Cats vs PCIFIC Esport by the Bo3.gg Team
PCIFIC Esport on Inferno Analysis
PCIFIC Esport demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for PCIFIC Esport on Inferno were scolleN, who contributed 25 kills, and eNs, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9501 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, PCIFIC Esport held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Lazer Cats on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Lazer Cats, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Lazer Cats on Inferno included Magic888, who contributed 17 kills, and nikitea, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7546 total damage, Lazer Cats couldn't prevent PCIFIC Esport from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Lazer Cats struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments